Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 16:31
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why are Indians so influenced by the Western culture, when the Indian tradition has so much to give?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Man eats dubious street food—ends up blowing apart his GI tract - Ars Technica
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Is Matt Gaetz qualified to be Attorney General of the United States?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Remarks at the Crypto Task Force Roundtable on Decentralized Finance - SEC.gov